1.
“This over-achieving beauty is running for City Council as head of
non-profit that’s only skin deep” – NY post

Lower Manhattan, was only described by the over-achieving beauty. What does this has to with her career? There is no correlation with Rajkumar’s beauty and her career. This candidate should have been described with influential, ambitious or determined not over-achieved at all, but the New York’s post decided to focus on Rajkumar’s appearance and neglect her achievements.
The writer of this article also used the word “skin deep” to
communicate to the audience that her non-profit organization is only fake or
superficial.
2.
“New UN Ambassador Interviewed About ‘Diplomacy Diapers'”

Imagine a widowed male ambassador, who raises 2 kids under
the age of 5, would he be called by the same name? Why how a mom balances work
and family comes up much more frequently than how a dad does it? Until the
problem between balancing work and raising kids is associated with working men
as much as it is with workingwomen, it will remain gendered.
No comments:
Post a Comment